Defence Long-Term Development Plan (LTDP)
(11 June 2002)
Contents | Previous | Next
Funding
Funding Guidelines
- The Government directed financial parameters are:
- up to $1 billion, in nominal terms, in capital injections over the next 10 years;
- current operating baselines set to 2005/06 with adjustments for unfunded depreciation thereafter;
- any inflationary pressure to be managed within these constraints until 2005/06; and
- leasing options may be considered where there is a neutral trade-off between capital and operating
expenditure.
Affordability, Options and Trade-Offs
- Funding constraints, cash flow management (both from depreciation and new capital) and defence industry
considerations will also affect priorities, timing and the overall affordability of the LTDP. Trade-offs
within and between projects are necessary. The projects presented in the LTDP take into account the
Government's existing funding parameters. Solutions have been developed to provide capabilities within the
financial parameters that are appropriate for New Zealand's circumstances and will deliver the Government's
policy. For most projects, however, accurate costing information cannot be determined until tender responses
are received. It is acknowledged that in order to determine the affordability of the LTDP, Defence needs to
improve the individual costing data on which the plan is based, on a project-by-project basis.
- In order to provide more robust decision-making information the process by which costing for acquisition
projects is developed is being reviewed. A revised costing review process will consider all elements of
defence capital expenditure, including acquisition costs, through-life costs and cost/risk mitigation.
Deflators will also be developed to reflect how military-related inflation impacts on defence capital
expenditure and planning.
- By changing levels of capability, cost and policy compliance it is possible to identify options within
projects. These options, which will be investigated for each project, could include phasing projects to
spread the cash flow or reducing the size and/or scope of a project. Reducing the level of capability
acquired could affect the NZDF's ability to deliver outputs designed to achieve the Government's policy
objectives.
Financial Risks
- There are several financial risks associated with the LTDP that will have to be managed to ensure the plan
remains affordable.
- Inflation. Estimated costs need to reflect inflation.
- Foreign Exchange Movements. The majority of the project costs included in the revised LTDP have been
converted from USD into NZD using exchange rate projections advised by Treasury (below). Any change to
these projections will result in changes to project costs.
Foreign Exchange Movements
| FY 02/03 |
FY 03/04 |
FY 04/05 Onwards |
| 0.44 |
0.49 |
0.51 |
- Upgrades. Military equipment requires regular upgrades to ensure that it is able to provide the required
capability. Upgrades are also important to keep pace with technological changes and to maintain
interoperability with other defence forces. Known upgrades have been included in the LTDP. Other
unpredicted upgrades may be required during the life of the equipment.
- Personnel and Operating Costs. Operating baseline changes will need to be managed to take account of pay
increases and changes in NZDF personnel numbers, training requirements, maintenance and operating
resulting from new equipment.
Projects Currently ‘Below the Funding Line'
- The LTDP contains those projects currently deemed necessary to deliver the capability required by the
Government, and which are being processed by the NZDF. Given the current financial parameters, however,
projects in the category of those that have benefit but are less critical to achieving policy objectives
are unlikely to be funded. This underlines the importance of reviewing projects that are ‘above the line'
in order to realise potential savings. These projects will still require work to clarify their scope,
utility across the policy objectives and cost, and will be included in future reviews of the LTDP. Changing
strategic circumstances could result in reprioritisation of projects.
Top | Previous | Next